Publications

publications by categories in reversed chronological order. generated by jekyll-scholar.

2025

  1. Rhesus monkeys show no preference for a left-to-right number-space mapping
    Alessandra Acadia Silva, Benjamin Pitt, and Stephen Ferrigno
    In Proceedings of the Annual Meeting of the Cognitive Science Society, 2025

2024

  1. Multidimensional spatial memory: One action, two reference frames
    Benjamin Pitt
    In Proceedings of the Annual Meeting of the Cognitive Science Society, 2024

2023

  1. No clear evidence for an innate left-to-right mental number line
    Benjamin Pitt, Daniel Casasanto, and Steven T Piantadosi
    Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 2023
  2. Flexible spatial memory in children: Different reference frames on different axes
    Benjamin Pitt, Sahra Aalaei, and Alison Gopnik
    In Proceedings of the annual meeting of the cognitive science society, 2023
  3. Bee sides: Still no clear evidence for an innate left-to-right mental number line
    Benjamin Pitt, Daniel Casasanto, and Steven T Piantadosi
    2023

2022

  1. Continuous manipulation of mental representations is compromised in cerebellar degeneration
    Samuel D McDougle, Jonathan S Tsay, Benjamin Pitt, and 4 more authors
    Brain, 2022
  2. Exact number concepts are limited to the verbal count range
    Benjamin Pitt, Edward Gibson, and Steven T Piantadosi
    Psychological Science, 2022
  3. Spatial metaphors and the design of everyday things
    Benjamin Pitt and Daniel Casasanto
    Frontiers in Psychology, 2022
  4. The Order of Magnitude: Why SNARC-like Tasks (Still) Cannot Support a Generalized Magnitude System
    Benjamin Pitt and Daniel Casasanto
    Cognitive Science, 2022
  5. Different reference frames on different axes: Space and language in indigenous Amazonians
    Benjamin Pitt, Alexandra Carstensen, Isabelle Boni, and 2 more authors
    Science Advances, 2022

2021

  1. Spatial concepts of number, size, and time in an indigenous culture
    Benjamin Pitt, Stephen Ferrigno, Jessica F Cantlon, and 3 more authors
    Science Advances, 2021
    Featured in ScienceNews and ntv
  2. Variation in spatial concepts: Different frames of reference on different axes
    Benjamin Pitt, Alexandra Carstensen, Edward Gibson, and 1 more author
    In Proceedings of the annual meeting of the cognitive science society, 2021

2020

  1. The correlations in experience principle: How culture shapes concepts of time and number.
    Benjamin Pitt and Daniel Casasanto
    Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 2020
  2. Multi-directional mappings in the minds of the Tsimane’: Size, time, and number on three spatial axes
    Benjamin Pitt, Daniel Casasanto, Stephen Ferrigno, and 2 more authors
    In Proceedings of the Annual Meeting of the Cognitive Science Society, 2020
  3. Cerebellar degeneration selectively disrupts continuous mental operations
    Samuel D McDougle, Jonathan Tsay, Benjamin Pitt, and 4 more authors
    bioRxiv, 2020

2019

  1. The faulty magnitude detector: Why SNARC-like tasks cannot support a generalized magnitude system
    Daniel Casasanto and Benjamin Pitt
    Cognitive Science, 2019

2018

  1. Spatializing emotion: No evidence for a domain-general magnitude system
    Benjamin Pitt and Daniel Casasanto
    Cognitive Science, 2018
  2. Time and numbers on the fingers: Dissociating the mental timeline and mental number line
    Benjamin Pitt, Kamilah Scales, and Daniel Casasanto
    In Proceedings of the Annual Meeting of the Cognitive Science Society, 2018

2016

  1. Spatializing emotion: a mapping of valence or magnitude?
    Benjamin Pitt and Daniel Casasanto
    In Proceedings of the Annual Meeting of the Cognitive Science Society, 2016
  2. Reading experience shapes the mental timeline but not the mental number line
    Benjamin Pitt and Daniel Casasanto
    In Proceedings of the Annual Meeting of the Cognitive Science Society, 2016

2014

  1. Experiential Origins of the Mental Number Line.
    Benjamin Pitt and Daniel Casasanto
    In Proceedings of the 36th Annual Conference of the Cognitive Science Society, 2014